MAC D for Danger is a part of The Matte Lip collection for and has a regular Matte finish. The original MAC Heaux Lipstick has Rihanna’s signature engraved on the lipstick bullet. All of them have the regular MAC lipstick packaging and the typical vanilla scent that all MAC lipsticks have.
Application-how did this product apply? glidestugs |
Moisturizing-how moisturizing is this product? hydratingdrying |
Long-Wearing-how long-wearing is this product? stays all daydisappears quickly |
Colour-does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation-how pigmented is this product? |
Luster-how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable-how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? builds easilyhard to build |
Feathering-how feathering is this product? stays putfeathers or bleeds |
Texture-how is the texture of this product? smoothgritty |
Value-how would you rate the value of this product overall? overdeliveredunderdelivered |
My Top favourite MAC lipsticks that suit every Asian skin tone Suscribe to my channel here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZOrwyBqCGhkyoHe0rmTxkg?subconfi. Mac skype for business. Actually, d for danger is one of my favorite colors, and it also makes teeth look whiter, which is a plus. This will probably work in a wide range of skintones as for a red-brownish color it does have some fuchsia in it. Formula is ok, drying but long lasting. Apr 03, 2018 MAC matte D for Danger has been described as a brick red shade by MAC but it would differ completely. It is a wonderful gorgeous shade of magenta which is wearable considering the muted look to it. The Cool toned pink based berry red shade by MAC is love at first sight! First, I prepped my lips with scrub and lip balm, then applied it to my lips.
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the application category the current four is a sign that responses to 'how did this product apply?' generally indicate glides. Considering feedback for the colour category the current rating of six indicates considering the question 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' heavily favor true to colour. Considering the pigmentation category the rating of six suggests reviewers in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' primarily suggest opaque. Reviewing the luster category a rating of one suggests users & critics evaluating 'how lustrous is this product?' generally suggest matte. Looking at review rankings for the texture category an average total of five suggests replies to 'how is the texture of this product?' frequently lean smooth.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
D For Danger Mac Matte Lipstick
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! How to format external hard drive for mac without erasing. post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .
Lately I’m very obsessed with MAC Cosmetics and a friend who knows me well gave me a few Christmas presents. So I received a new lipstick and lip pencil from MAC and I was so excited to try them out! Thankyou santa :)!
Today I will review the lipstick D for Danger and the lip pencil Beet.
MAC D for Danger from The Matte Lip Collection of MAC Cosmetics is a dark berry lipstick with a matte finish. I really love the colour, I already own many red lipsticks in different shades but I didn’t own this colour in my collection yet. It’s the perfect fall and winter red, the berry undertone makes it look really chique.
The lipstick costs €19,50 and is available in MAC Cosmetics shops and counters. You can also order it online at www.maccosmetics.com
MAC Beet from MAC Cosmetics is the sugar to the coffee of D for Danger. It has the same dark berry colour. The lip pencil has a soft and smooth yet not brittle texture and spreads easily on the lips. It has overall a great pigmentation, one swip is just enough.
https://renewarch501.weebly.com/toast-titanium-for-mac.html. The lip pencil costs €15,50.
These are the swatches. It’s very pigmentated and beautifully matte.
D for Danger and Beet are a match made in heaven! The colours are exactly the same.
D for Danger and Beet are a match made in heaven! The colours are exactly the same.
I’m so happy with my gifts! I really like the formula of the lipstick and lip pencil. It’s matte which makes it lasts for a long time, it can last up to 5-6 hours depending on what you eat or drink. Since you can build up the color, or leave a wash of colour on the lips, it’ll leave a stain .
It is not dry nor hydrating, it’s perfect!
It is not dry nor hydrating, it’s perfect!
D For Danger Mac On Dark Skin
Loves, Felicia
D For Danger Mac Lipstick For Dark Skin
Advertisements